Responsible AI deployment review rubric
Moderate the review of a bounded AI deployment, its human oversight and its monitoring with distinct evidence-based descriptors; this illustrative rubric is not a validated instrument. Typed FlowScript for assessment design. Keywords: rubric, assessment, grading, criteria.
What this template contains
- Source
- 103 lines
Make it your own.
// Moderate the review of a bounded AI deployment, its human oversight and its monitoring with distinct evidence-based descriptors; this illustrative rubric is not a validated instrument.
// Synthetic worked example: all entities, schedules and measurements are illustrative.
// Every string below is EXAMPLE text from a fictional model: replace it.
// Replace assumptions and inputs before applying this model to actual work.
rubric assessment {
title: "Illustrative Responsible AI deployment review rubric"
course: "Advanced professional practice"
assignment: "Evaluate a bounded deployment with human oversight and monitoring"
author: "Flowss teaching example"
}
criterion criterion_0 {
name: "Use context"
weight: .25
description: "Affected people and purpose are explicit"
}
level level_0_0 {
criterion: criterion_0
label: "Emerging"
points: 1
descriptor: "Defines only model capability"
}
level level_0_1 {
criterion: criterion_0
label: "Proficient"
points: 2
descriptor: "Describes users, harms and benefits"
}
level level_0_2 {
criterion: criterion_0
label: "Advanced"
points: 3
descriptor: "Identifies excluded uses and affected non-users"
}
criterion criterion_1 {
name: "Evaluation"
weight: .25
description: "Evidence matches deployment conditions"
}
level level_1_0 {
criterion: criterion_1
label: "Emerging"
points: 1
descriptor: "Reports one aggregate score"
}
level level_1_1 {
criterion: criterion_1
label: "Proficient"
points: 2
descriptor: "Evaluates relevant slices and failure cases"
}
level level_1_2 {
criterion: criterion_1
label: "Advanced"
points: 3
descriptor: "Uses independent data and uncertainty analysis"
}
criterion criterion_2 {
name: "Human oversight"
weight: .25
description: "Intervention and appeal are actionable"
}
level level_2_0 {
criterion: criterion_2
label: "Emerging"
points: 1
descriptor: "Mentions a human in the loop"
}
level level_2_1 {
criterion: criterion_2
label: "Proficient"
points: 2
descriptor: "Defines authority and escalation routes"
}
level level_2_2 {
criterion: criterion_2
label: "Advanced"
points: 3
descriptor: "Tests workload, override and appeal effectiveness"
}
criterion criterion_3 {
name: "Monitoring"
weight: .25
description: "Post-release accountability is sustained"
}
level level_3_0 {
criterion: criterion_3
label: "Emerging"
points: 1
descriptor: "Assumes launch evaluation is enough"
}
level level_3_1 {
criterion: criterion_3
label: "Proficient"
points: 2
descriptor: "Assigns monitoring and incident ownership"
}
level level_3_2 {
criterion: criterion_3
label: "Advanced"
points: 3
descriptor: "Defines drift triggers, rollback and review cadence"
}
view criteria: rubric_grid