Teaching Case — A Stage With Nothing to Balance Against
The half of the discipline that is easier to get wrong. This review never states how many reports it sought for retrieval, so two stages cannot be balanced at all — and the engine reports them as GAPS naming the missing keyword, rather than assuming a number and reporting clean. "430 = 430 if we assume nothing was lost in retrieval" is exactly the sentence a reporting standard exists to prevent. The box is drawn as "n = not stated", never blank and never zero.
Make it your own.
title "Workplace mindfulness programmes — review"
db_records 1240
register_records 60
duplicates 265
excluded_auto 40
title_screened 995
title_excluded 780
# "abstracts_sought" is never stated, so the screening stage has no
# remainder and the retrieval stage has no inflow.
abstracts_unavailable 11
fulltext_assessed 204
exclude_reason "No control condition" 72
exclude_reason "Not workplace-delivered" 45
studies_included 87