Skip to content
flowss
Start freeChecking your session
Decision matrix (weighted / Pugh) templates

Decision Matrix — Roadmap Feature Prioritisation

Six roadmap epics scored on pipeline ARR, customer demand, strategic fit, engineering effort and delivery risk, the measured criteria rescaled onto a 1–10 scale and the columns ordered by rank. SSO & SCIM ranks first at 8.51, 1.72 ahead of AI meeting summaries, and offline mobile mode and custom dashboards are dominated outright. Illustrative values.

Decision matrix (weighted / Pugh)Business & StrategyDecision matrix (weighted / Pugh) syntax docs
Template previewDecision matrix (weighted / Pugh)
Q3 roadmap — feature prioritisationQ3 roadmap — feature prioritisationSix candidate epics, measured where data exists · columns ordered by rankWeighted scoringScale 1–105 criteria6 optionsCRITERIONWEIGHTSSO & SCIMRECOMMENDEDAI meetingsummariesAudit logexportUsage-basedbillingCustomdashboardsOffline mobilemodePipeline ARR unlockedmeasured, £k30%£420kscore 10£260kscore 5.6£180kscore 3.5£310kscore 7£150kscore 2.6£90kscore 1Accounts that asked for itmeasured, %20%34%score 841%score 1022%score 4.712%score 1.828%score 6.39%score 1Strategic fit20%876954Engineering effortmeasured, weeks · lower is better20%9 weeksscore 7.512 weeksscore 64 weeksscore 1016 weeksscore 410 weeksscore 722 weeksscore 1Delivery risk (1 = low)lower is better10%362748Weighted scoreΣ weight × score, of 108.5185.1% of max6.7967.9% of max6.0760.7% of max5.4754.7% of max5.1651.6% of max1.8018% of maxRankhighest score first1st2nd3rd4th5th6thWeighted totalsEach bar is split into its criteria's weighted contributions (colours match the dots in the table); ranked best first.012345678910SSO & SCIM8.5185.1%AI meeting summaries6.7967.9%Audit log export6.0760.7%Usage-based billing5.4754.7%Custom dashboards5.1651.6%Offline mobile mode1.8018%FINDINGS & SENSITIVITYROBUSTSSO & SCIM ranks first at 8.51 of 10 (85.1%), 1.72 ahead of AI meeting summaries.Sensitivity (robust): AI meeting summaries draws level with SSO & SCIM if the weight on “Accounts that asked for it” rises from 20% to 57.2% (+37.2 points), the otherweights rescaled in proportion — the smallest single-weight change that changes the winner.No single score change within the 1–10 scale lets another option draw level with SSO & SCIM.Custom dashboards is dominated by SSO & SCIM: no better on any criterion and worse on 5, so it can be dropped without changing the decision.Offline mobile mode is dominated by SSO & SCIM: no better on any criterion and worse on 5, so it can be dropped without changing the decision.Illustrative figures for a fictional B2B SaaS product; ARR is the sales team's 12-month pipeline estimate.

Make it your own.

title "Q3 roadmap — feature prioritisation"
subtitle "Six candidate epics, measured where data exists · columns ordered by rank"
scale 1-10
sort rank
note "Illustrative figures for a fictional B2B SaaS product; ARR is the sales team's 12-month pipeline estimate."

options "SSO & SCIM" | "Usage-based billing" | "Offline mobile mode" | "AI meeting summaries" | "Audit log export" | "Custom dashboards"

"Pipeline ARR unlocked"      weight 30 unit "£k"     : 420 310 90 260 180 150
"Accounts that asked for it" weight 20 unit "%"      : 34 12 9 41 22 28
"Strategic fit"              weight 20               : 8 9 4 7 6 5
"Engineering effort"         weight 20 unit "weeks" lower : 9 16 22 12 4 10
"Delivery risk (1 = low)"    weight 10 lower         : 3 7 8 6 2 4